This means that it is essential for the accused`s lawyer and prosecutor to reach an agreement on what the accused will likely get in an expected pleading agreement. Because of the high stakes, the decision to participate in a proffer should be made with the advice of a lawyer, after the lawyer has thoroughly reviewed the facts and the law. Second, cooperation may be prudent when the risks of an accused`s trial are significant and cooperation would allow him to obtain considerable recognition for his cooperation. This credit could mean that the cooperating person might not be charged with a criminal offense or that the person might be charged with a minor offense, or that the cooperation might eliminate or minimize a prison sentence. The most common type of collaboration is an interview with Proffer. A Proffer agreement is often an opportunity for a cooperating defendant or suspect to obtain a favorable sentencing recommendation. As has already been said, if an accused decides to enter into a proffer agreement, the prosecutor will enter into an agreement to grant the accused many decisive advantages in exchange for receiving important information about the case. . . .